Why in News?
The Ordinance in Delhi promulgated for the creation of an authority to effect transfers and postings of Group-A officers; it has been challenged by the Delhi government.
Ordinance facilitated the setting up of a National Capital Civil Service Authority (NCCSA) for the transfer of and disciplinary proceedings against Group-A officers from the Delhi Andaman Nicobar Dadra Nagar HaveIi Civil Service cadre (DANICS).
 
What is the Ordinance all about? 
The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance, 2023 was promulgated by the President in May 2023 to provide for a comprehensive scheme of administration of services in Delhi.
The ordinance came after the Supreme Court handed over the control of services in Delhi, excluding police, public order and land, to the elected government. 

What does Ordinance seeks to set up?
The ordinance seeks to set up a National Capital Civil Service Authority (NCCSA) for the transfer of and disciplinary proceedings against Group-A officers from services in the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.
The issuance of the Ordinance empowers the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi with control over services, thereby challenging the elected government's authority in matters of officials' transfer and posting. 
This development raises significant constitutional apprehensions regarding the delicate balance of power between the elected government and the Lieutenant Governor.

National Capital Civil Service Authority (NCCSA):  
·         NCCSA consists of Chief Minister of Delhi, the Chief Secretary and the Principal Secretary of the Home department.
·         Decisions made by the NCCSA will be based on a majority vote, which means that the elected Chief Minister can be overruled by the two senior bureaucrats.
·         If the LG disagrees with the recommendations made by the NCCSA, NCCSA have the power to return the recommendations for reconsideration.
·         If a difference of opinion persists, the final decision will be made by the LG

Issue of “Triple Chain of Accountability”:  
In May 2023, the Supreme Court formulated the concept of the “triple chain of accountability”.
The triple chain of accountability is integral to representative democracy and proceeds as follows:
·         Civil servants are accountable to the cabinet.
·         The cabinet is accountable to the legislature, or the Legislative Assembly.
·         The Legislative Assembly is (periodically) accountable to the electorate.
Any action that severs this “triple chain of accountability” fundamentally undermines the core constitutional principle of representative government, which is at the bedrock of our democracy.

Power Struggle:  
·         The ordinance has led to a power struggle between the elected government and the Lieutenant Governor.
·         The elected government claims that the ordinance undermines their authority and violates the Constitution.
·         The Lieutenant Governor argues that the ordinance is necessary to ensure proper governance in Delhi.

Issues with Provisions of the Ordinance:  
·         The ordinance gives the Lieutenant Governor the power to make appointments to key bureaucratic positions in Delhi.
·         It also gives the Lieutenant Governor the power to transfer and post officials, which was previously the sole responsibility of the elected government.
·         The ordinance also states that in case of any difference of opinion between the Lieutenant Governor and the elected government, the former's opinion will prevail.

Constitutional Issues:  
·         The elected government claims that the ordinance violates the Constitution, which gives them the power to make appointments and transfer officials.
·         The Lieutenant Governor's increased powers are a violation of the principle of federalism, which is enshrined in the Constitution.
  
Governance Issue:  
·         The ordinance has created confusion and uncertainty among the civil service officers working in Delhi government departments. 
·         The ordinance has also affected the delivery of public services and welfare schemes in Delhi.

What are the Possible Consequences of the Ordinance?  
·         It may create a constitutional crisis and a power tussle between the Centre and the Delhi government over the control of civil services in the national capital.
·         It may undermine the autonomy and democracy of the Delhi government and the will of the people who elected it.
·         It may hamper the effective administration and governance of Delhi, as the civil service officers may face uncertainty and confusion over their roles and responsibilities.
·         It may invite legal challenges and judicial scrutiny, as the ordinance seems to violate the Supreme Court’s judgment and Article 239AA of the Constitution.

What are Various Arguments Related to the Ordinance?  
Argument in Favour of the Delhi Services Ordinance:
  
1. Balancing of Interests:
·         The ordinance is necessary to balance the local and national interests of the people of Delhi with the democratic will of the entire nation reflected through the President of India.
·         The ordinance ensures that the Centre has a say in the administration of services in the national capital, which is vital for maintaining public order, security and development.
·         The ordinance also respects the role of the elected Delhi government by giving it representation in the National Capital Civil Services Authority (NCCSA) which will decide on service-related matters by majority vote.
  
2. Constitutional Validity:
·         The ordinance is in line with Article 239AA of the Constitution, which gives special status to Delhi as a Union Territory with a legislative assembly and allows Parliament to make laws on matters that are normally within the exclusive domain of the States, such as services.
·         The ordinance does not violate the Supreme Court’s judgment, which only held that the Delhi government has legislative and executive powers over services but did not bar Parliament from making laws on the same subject.
·         The ordinance is also consistent with Article 239AB of the Constitution, which empowers the President to make regulations for peace, progress and good government of Delhi.
  
3. Scope of Review:
·         The ordinance is within the scope of review of the Supreme Court’s judgment, which may have overlooked some aspects of Delhi’s unique constitutional position as the national capital and the role of the Lieutenant Governor as an agent of the Centre.
·         The ordinance seeks to clarify and streamline the scheme of administration of services in Delhi, which has been a source of conflict and confusion for a long time.
·         The ordinance also provides an opportunity for the Supreme Court to reconsider its judgment and address any errors or anomalies that may have crept in.

Argument Against the Delhi Services Ordinance:  
1. Undermining of Democracy:
·         The ordinance undermines the principles of representative democracy and responsible governance, which are the pillars of India’s constitutional order.
·         The ordinance takes away the control of services from the elected Delhi government, which has a clear mandate from the people of Delhi to legislate and administer on their behalf.
·         The ordinance also reduces the role of the Chief Minister and the council of ministers to a rubber stamp, as they can be overruled by two bureaucrats in the NCCSA, who are ultimately accountable to the Lieutenant Governor and the Centre.
  
2. Constitutional Violation:
·         The ordinance violates and nullifies the Supreme Court’s judgment, which held that the Delhi government has legislative and executive powers over services in the national capital, except matters relating to public order, police and land.
·         The ordinance also violates Article 239AA of the Constitution, which gives special status to Delhi as a Union Territory with a legislative assembly and envisages a harmonious relationship between the Centre and the Delhi government.
·         The ordinance also violates the principle of federalism, which is a basic feature of the Constitution, and encroaches upon the domain of the States.

Way Forward:  
1. Formation of a Expert Committee:
·         An expert committee comprising legal, constitutional, and administrative experts can be formed to provide recommendations on resolving the issue.
·         This committee should thoroughly analyze the legal and administrative aspects, review precedents, and propose practical solutions that uphold democratic principles and maintain the delicate balance of power between the central government and the elected government of Delhi.
  
2. Dialogue and Negotiation:
·         Engaging in meaningful dialogue and negotiation between the central government and the Delhi government is crucial for resolving the issue.
·         Both parties should come together to discuss their respective concerns and interests, seeking a mutually agreeable solution that respects the democratic principles and the unique status of Delhi as the national capital.
  
3. Respect for Constitutional Principles:
·         Throughout the resolution process, it is vital for all stakeholders to demonstrate a commitment for upholding constitutional principles, including democratic governance, separation of powers, and the rights of elected representatives.
·         Respecting the constitutional framework will provide a solid foundation for resolving the issue in a fair and transparent manner.

Mains Question:
Q: Federalism is a democracy-complementing but it was undermined in NCT of Delhi- Examine.