Daily Current Affairs for UPSC 10th Dec 2025




Index

S.No

Topic

Page No

Daily Hindu Analysis (YouTube)

1.

Charting an agenda on the right to health


2.

Value of water: evaluating the pricelessness of clean, potable water


3.

Aditya-L1 joins global effort revealing why the 2024 solar storm behaved unusually


4.

INDIA bloc MPs seek to impeach Madras HC judge

5.

SURYAKIRAN-XIX: India-Nepal Army exercise concludes in Uttarakhand


Daily Current Affairs (App)

6.

2nd WHO Global Summit on Traditional Medicine


7.

Dumping

8.

Senna spectabilis

9.

Saudi UNESCO Global Network of Learning Cities (GNLC)



Charting an agenda on the right to health




MULTI-DISCIPLINARY SYLLABUS MAPPING (GS-I, GS-II, GS-III, GS-IV)

This topic spans all General Studies papers, making it extremely high leverage.


GS-I (Society)

  • Social inequality in access to services
  • Discrimination: caste, gender, disability, LGBTQ+
  • Impacts of poverty & exclusion on health
  • Community participation & social movements

GS-II (Governance, Social Justice)

  • Article 21 → Right to Health
  • Public health institutions, regulatory frameworks
  • Issues in service delivery & PPP governance
  • Welfare state, social sector priority
  • Laws: Clinical Establishments Act, insurance regulations
  • Vulnerable groups & inclusion

GS-III (Economy, Development, Environment)

  • Public expenditure on health
  • Out-of-pocket spending burden
  • Pharmaceutical pricing & irrational drug practices
  • Climate change impacts on health
  • Food security & environmental determinants

GS-IV (Ethics)

  • Equity, justice & fairness in essential public services
  • Ethical dilemmas in health commercialisation
  • Responsibility of the state & health workers
  • Transparency & accountability in regulation

“RIGHT TO HEALTH AGENDA IN INDIA”


CONTEXT & SIGNIFICANCE
  • The National Convention on Health Rights (Dec 11–12, 2025) is convened by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and brings together 400+ health professionals, activists, and civil society networks.
  • Objective: create a roadmap for operationalising the Right to Health and resist increasing commercialisation of healthcare.
  • The convention reflects lessons from COVID-19, which exposed systemic weaknesses: shortages, inequity, poor working conditions, supply-chain failures.
  • It emphasises public-centric governance and strengthens alternatives to privatisation.

II. CHALLENGING PRIVATISATION OF HEALTH CARE

1. Rapid expansion of private sector

  • Growth in corporate hospitals, insurance-linked care, private medical colleges.
  • Health facilities increasingly handed to private entities through PPP models.
  • This weakens public services and shifts medical education into profit-driven domains.

2. Consequences for public health

  • Healthcare becomes unaffordable for millions depending on public provisioning.
  • Private sector dominance increases inequality, reduces access in rural/tribal regions.
  • Over-medicalisation: unnecessary surgeries, irrational procedures, excessive billing.

3. Regulatory failure

  • The Clinical Establishments Act (2010) intended to regulate pricing & quality, but implementation is weak.
  • Violations include:
    • Overcharging
    • Unethical marketing
    • Non-transparent pricing
    • Patient rights violations

4. Concern articulated in the article

  • Privatisation threatens already weakened public health systems and undermines the right to health.
  • JSA leaders from Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Mumbai, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat highlight ground realities of privatisation’s harmful effects.

III. LOW PUBLIC HEALTH SPENDING & HIGH OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENDITURE

1. India’s low public investment

  • India spends just 2% of the Union Budget on health.
  • Per capita public spending is only $25/year (one of the lowest globally).

2. High OOP (Out-of-pocket expenditure)

  • Despite government schemes, OOP remains high, particularly for medicines & diagnostics.
  • Insurance schemes often fail to bridge the gap between needs and actual coverage.

3. Consequences

  • Pushes millions into poverty every year.
  • Reduces access to essential services.
  • Skews the system toward hospitalisation and curative care rather than preventive/public health.

4. Structural issues

  • Government-supported insurance disproportionately benefits private hospitals.
  • Mismatch between claims and ground realities of schemes like PMJAY.

5. Article’s emphasis

  • Calls for alternative financing frameworks:
    • Increased government spending
    • Reduced OOP
    • Equitable access
    • Strengthened public provisioning

IV. RIGHTS-BASED REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS

1. Need for enforceable patient rights

  • Charter of Patient Rights must become mandatory.
  • Transparent pricing, quality standards, and grievance redress systems are essential.

2. Health as a fundamental right

  • Article 21 jurisprudence (Paschim Banga, Mohini Jain, Parmanand Katara).
  • Convention aims to make health care a rights-based universal entitlement.

3. Regulatory gaps in private sector

  • Poor monitoring of clinical establishments.
  • No effective mechanism to control:
    • Price-gouging
    • Unethical drug promotion
    • Irrational treatments

V. JUSTICE FOR HEALTH WORKERS

1. COVID-19 lessons

  • Revealed dependency on doctors, nurses, paramedics, ASHA workers.
  • Yet, large sections of health workers face:
    • Low wages
    • Insecure employment
    • No social security
    • Poor working conditions

2. Why worker justice is essential

  • Better working conditions → resilient health systems.
  • Health workers' associations demand:
    • Stable contracts
    • Safe workplaces
    • Fair wages
    • Recognition of their role

VI. ACCESS TO MEDICINES: THE MOST EXPENSIVE COMPONENT OF HEALTHCARE

1. Medicines = 50% of household medical expenditure

  • But 80% of medicines fall outside price control, making treatment unaffordable.

2. Issues identified

  • Irrational drug combinations
  • High retail markups
  • Unethical marketing practices
  • Supply chain inefficiencies
  • Rising GST concerns

3. Convention’s focus

  • Strengthen price regulation mechanisms.
  • Encourage public-sector drug production.
  • Improve access to essential medicines.

VII. STRENGTHENING PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEMS

1. Why public provisioning matters

  • It is the only way to ensure equity.
  • Reduces burden on households.
  • Prevents commercial exploitation.

2. Successful public health models highlighted

  • Community-led initiatives
  • State-level innovations:
    • Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation
    • Kerala decentralised health planning
    • Rajasthan free medicines scheme

3. Vision

  • Build a robust, responsive, universal public system with decentralised planning & community engagement.

VIII. ELIMINATING SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH

1. Persistent inequalities

  • Caste hierarchies: Dalits, Adivasis denied equal access.
  • Gender discrimination → women lack access to reproductive & emergency care.
  • LGBTQ+ persons face stigma and exclusion.
  • Persons with disabilities face barriers to physical and digital access.

2. Convention’s focus session

  • Intersectionality of caste, gender, disability, and sexuality.
  • Health systems must embed non-discrimination, inclusion, sensitivity.

3. Social determinants

  • Food security
  • Environmental pollution
  • Climate change impacts
  • Poor nutrition

All these reinforce health inequities.


IX. INTER-ORGANISATIONAL COLLABORATION & POLICY DIALOGUE

1. Role of Jan Swasthya Abhiyan

  • 25 years of advocacy & community mobilisation.
  • Works across 20+ states with:
    • Women’s groups
    • Science groups
    • Rural movements
    • Patient groups
    • Civil society networks

2. Convention & Parliamentary engagement

  • Dialogue with MPs during winter session.
  • Aim: highlight pressing health issues & push for systemic reforms.

X. VISION FOR THE NEXT DECADE

The overarching message: Health care must be recognised as a basic human right in India.
Future agenda includes:

  • Universal access
  • Equitable financing
  • Strong public systems
  • Worker justice
  • Ending discrimination
  • Community-centric governance
  • Regulatory overhaul

UPSC MAINS QUESTION

“Growing privatisation of healthcare in India threatens equity and undermines the constitutional vision of the Right to Health.” Critically examine.



MULTI-DISCIPLINARY SYLLABUS MAPPING


GS-I (Geography & Society)

  • Water scarcity & rural–urban inequality
  • Gendered burden of water collection
  • Social determinants of health (water quality → disease burden)
  • Community-level water patterns

GS-II (Governance, Welfare, Policies & Social Justice)

  • Rights-based approaches to water access
  • Jal Jeevan Mission and water governance
  • Role of state in ensuring equitable service delivery
  • Behavioural insights for public policy
  • Vulnerable groups (women, rural poor) and access to water

GS-III (Economy, Environment, Infrastructure)

  • Water as an economic good vs public good
  • Infrastructure deficits in rural water supply
  • Public investment vs cost-recovery pricing
  • Environmental health & pollution
  • Sustainable water management
  • Resource valuation & welfare economics

GS-IV (Ethics)

  • Ethical obligation of the state to ensure safe water
  • Environmental ethics → intergenerational justice
  • Equity in distribution of public resources
  • Dignity of labour – women’s burden

ESSAY (Major Theme)

  • Water scarcity, inequality, dignity, human development
  • How undervaluing water distorts public policy

Value of water: evaluating the pricelessness of clean, potable water.

(Structured exactly in line with the article’s themes + UPSC mains requirements)


I. CONTEXT & SIGNIFICANCE

Clean water is indispensable for survival, health, and overall human well-being, yet substantial sections of India’s population lack access to safe drinking water. Despite technological and policy improvements, nearly 30% of rural households still rely on unsafe sources. The editorial is based on a rigorous experimental study conducted in Odisha which provides rare, empirical evidence of how households truly value clean water, challenging long-standing assumptions that low-income households are unwilling to pay for improved water quality.

The study's significance lies in its ability to reveal behavioural preferences that traditional valuation methods overlook. It highlights the mismatch between infrastructure development, service reliability, and actual household needs. The findings have deep implications for water policy, welfare models, and sustainable development, emphasising that the value of clean water extends far beyond monetary price—it shapes health outcomes, labour patterns, and dignity.


II. UNDERSTANDING EXISTING GAPS IN WATER VALUATION RESEARCH

1. Limits of traditional measurement methods

Previous research relies heavily on indirect measures such as chlorine uptake, filter adoption, price elasticity studies, or evaluations of riparian consumption patterns. These proxy indicators underestimate how households actually perceive water quality, because they fail to capture:

  • Time and labour spent in water collection
  • Burden of boiling or filtering water
  • Psychological comfort and trust in the water source
  • Taste and cultural preferences
  • Health risks associated with untreated water

2. Consequence of methodological gaps

As a result, governments often undervalue the true benefits of improved water systems and continue investing in infrastructure that does not address reliability, treatment, or last-mile delivery. This gap in evidence limits the effectiveness of water policies and fails to capture the multidimensional benefits households associate with clean water.

3. Contribution highlighted in the article

The Odisha study directly measures how households value clean, potable water—separate from infrastructure or technology. This provides a more accurate basis for designing equitable and efficient drinking water policies in low-income contexts.


III. MEASURING THE VALUE OF WATER: THE ODISHA EXPERIMENT

1. Study Design

The study was conducted between 2021 and 2023 across 180 villages in Odisha, where severe access constraints to safe drinking water persist. While piped water connections exist on paper, the reliability of supply is extremely poor. Survey data showed that 83% of households lacked access to continuous piped water, and nearly half relied daily on distant or untreated sources.

2. Experimental methodology

Households were assigned redeemable entitlements (vouchers) that could be exchanged either for:

  • Clean, safe water
    or
  • Cash equivalent

This design allows researchers to observe real-life behavioural choices, rather than hypothetical preferences. Households were placed in conditions mimicking their actual burden—travel distances, treatment practices, or irregular supply.

3. Unique contribution of the study

This experiment represents one of the clearest methods of quantifying water value independent of confounding factors such as:

  • Infrastructure availability
  • Taste and cultural norms
  • Traditional water preferences
  • Payment ability constraints

It provides concrete evidence that can inform direct and equitable drinking water policies.


IV. KEY FINDINGS: HOUSEHOLDS VALUE CLEAN WATER HIGHLY

1. Strong preference for clean water

The study found that households overwhelmingly chose water entitlements over cash. This is particularly remarkable because low-income households usually prefer liquidity. Their willingness-to-pay (WTP) for clean water was substantially higher than estimates derived from earlier indirect studies.

2. Reasons behind preference

The findings show that households value:

  • Protection from disease
  • Reduction of daily drudgery
  • Assurance of safety and purity
  • Convenience and reliability
  • Time saved from collection and treatment

3. Implications

This contradicts long-held assumptions that poor households care more about affordability than water quality. Instead, they value quality deeply but often lack reliable access to high-quality sources.

4. Immediate benefits visible to households

Improved water quality generates instant, perceivable benefits, strengthening consumer trust and willingness to switch when reliable supply is provided.


V. DIFFERENCES IN BEHAVIOUR & WHAT THEY REVEAL

1. Variations within villages

Randomisation revealed differences in behaviour largely attributed to variation in:

  • Infrastructure
  • Treatment burden
  • Access inequality

Rather than differences in intrinsic demand.

2. Revealing non-monetary burdens

The study highlights several hidden burdens associated with low-quality water access:

  • Physical labour (carrying pots, walking long distances)
  • Opportunity cost of time
  • Health risks and medical expenses
  • Loss of productivity

3. Why earlier studies understated true value

Previous methods focused narrowly on:

  • Price sensitivity
  • Uptake of water technology
  • Isolated behaviour under controlled conditions

These failed to account for the combined physical, financial, emotional, and health burdens of poor water access.


VI. UNDERSTANDING CHOICES: THE PSYCHOLOGY AND REALITY OF WATER DEMAND

1. Clean water does not require persuasion—it requires access

The study suggests that households do not resist improved water due to mistrust or habit. Instead, they lack:

  • Continuous supply
  • Consistent quality
  • Infrastructure that reaches their homes

2. When access improves, behaviour changes instantly

Unlike technology adoption (e.g., filters or chlorine tablets), clean water is used immediately and willingly when reliable supply exists.

3. What households truly respond to

Households care less about:

  • Taste
  • Temperature
  • Source traditions

And more about:

  • Reliability
  • Safety
  • Reduced drudgery
  • Ease of access

4. Policy misunderstanding corrected

The major misconception — that low-income households do not value water quality — is debunked.


VII. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: DESIGNING BETTER WATER SYSTEMS

1. Infrastructure must prioritise reliability over coverage claims

Piped systems on paper do not translate into usable systems unless:

  • Pressure is stable
  • Supply is continuous
  • Treatment is consistent
  • Maintenance is timely

2. Investing in quality water benefits entire communities

Benefits include:

  • Lower disease burden
  • Lower medical costs
  • Higher productivity
  • Reduced gendered labour
  • Improved school attendance

3. Targeting interventions effectively

The study highlights interventions that are most impactful when infrastructure remains weak:

  • Village-level water treatment units
  • Strengthening last-mile connectivity
  • Improving local governance over water systems

4. Integrating behavioural insights

Water policy must incorporate how households think, behave, and value water rather than assuming price dictates behaviour.


VIII. RETHINKING WATER GOVERNANCE

1. Moving beyond technology-centric paradigms

The editorial stresses that technology alone cannot solve water scarcity. The real challenge lies in:

  • Unequal distribution of supply
  • Water inequality shaped by poverty
  • Infrastructure failures
  • Lack of accountability

2. Water as a public good, not a market commodity

The study supports public investment in water systems because returns are multidimensional, including:

  • Better health
  • Time saved
  • Labour dignity
  • Improved quality of life

3. Welfare-enhancing spending

Governments must expand spending not only to build systems but to:

  • Maintain water quality
  • Ensure equitable access
  • Reduce barriers faced by women and vulnerable communities

IX. BROADER SOCIAL & ECONOMIC DETERMINANTS CONNECTED TO WATER

1. Health impacts

Unsafe water is linked to:

  • Diarrheal disease
  • Malnutrition
  • Anaemia
  • Long-term cognitive impairment

2. Food security

Water quality and availability affect:

  • Cooking
  • Hygiene
  • Women’s nutritional practices

3. Environmental and climate vulnerabilities

Water scarcity is exacerbated by:

  • Drought
  • Declining groundwater
  • Pollution
  • Climate-induced variability

X. VISION FOR THE FUTURE: RECOGNISING WATER’S TRUE VALUE

The overarching message is that water is far more valuable than policymakers have recognised. Its value cannot be captured through narrow economic metrics alone. Clean water contributes to dignity, well-being, productivity, gender equality, and long-term human development. The next decade must prioritise:

  • High-quality, reliable water supply
  • Behaviour-informed policy design
  • Equity in access
  • Investment in public systems
  • Reducing treatment burdens
  • Empowering communities
  • Strong maintenance & monitoring models

Water must be treated not merely as a utility but as a fundamental right essential for human flourishing.

UPSC MAINS QUESTION

Do you agree that water governance must move beyond technology-based solutions to focus on reliability, equity, and behavioural insights? Substantiate.


TWO MAINS QUESTIONS INTERLINKING BOTH THEMES (RIGHT TO HEALTH + CLEAN WATER)

1. “Safe drinking water is not merely a resource but an essential prerequisite for the Right to Health.” Analyse how improved water access can reinforce India’s public health goals and reduce systemic health inequities.

2. Evaluate how integrated policies on water quality, health workforce strengthening, and equitable public provisioning can contribute together to creating a resilient, rights-based health ecosystem in India.



GS Paper III (Science & Technology)

A. Space Technology & ISRO Missions

  • Aditya-L1 as India's first dedicated solar mission
  • Halo orbit around Lagrange Point L1
  • ISRO’s technological capabilities

B. Science & Tech Developments & Applications

  • Solar physics:
    • Corona, CMEs, magnetic reconnection
    • Solar wind, energetic particles
  • Space-weather forecasting
    • Impact on satellites, GPS, power grids
  • Orbit dynamics (Lagrange points)

➡️ GS Paper I (Geography)

  • Solar phenomena & space weather
  • Influence on Earth's magnetosphere

➡️ Prelims Syllabus

  • Science & Technology:
    • Space missions (Aditya-L1, payloads, objectives)
    • Basic physics of the Sun
  • Current events of scientific importance


Aditya-L1 joins global effort revealing why the 2024 solar storm behaved unusually




1. What is the article about?

The article explains how India’s solar observatory Aditya-L1, working with six U.S. satellites, solved the mystery behind why the May 2024 solar storm behaved in an unusually powerful way.
This marks a major scientific breakthrough in understanding solar storms and space weather.


2. What is a Solar Storm?

Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs)

  • CMEs are huge bubbles of hot gas and magnetic fields thrown out from the Sun into space.
  • Think of them as giant magnetic balloons burst from the Sun.

Why are they dangerous?

When CMEs hit Earth, they disturb our magnetic field, damaging:

  • Satellites
  • GPS navigation
  • Communication systems
  • Power grids

Example: The 1989 Quebec blackout happened because a solar storm disrupted the power grid.


3. Why was the 2024 solar storm unusual?

Normal CME behaviour

Usually, a CME carries a twisted magnetic field (like a coiled rope).
As it approaches Earth, this interacts with Earth’s magnetic shield in predictable ways.

What happened in 2024? (The strange behaviour)

  • Two CMEs collided with each other in space.
  • They squeezed each other so tightly that their magnetic field lines broke and reconnected in new ways.
  • This is known as magnetic reconnection.

Why is this important?

Because this reconnection made the storm far stronger than expected.

Simple example:
Imagine two ropes twisted together. If they snap and rejoin in a new pattern, they can tighten suddenly and hit harder.
This is what happened with the magnetic fields of the CMEs.


4. What did Aditya-L1 discover?

Magnetic Reconnection Region Was Huge

Using precise magnetic readings, Aditya-L1 mapped the area where the magnetic fields broke and rejoined.
It was found to be:

  • 1.3 million km across
  • About 100 times the size of Earth

This is the first time in the world such a giant reconnection region inside a CME has been observed.


5. Why is this discovery important?

A. Better Predictions of Solar Storms

Understanding CME collisions and reconnections helps us predict:

  • When a storm will hit
  • How strong it will be
  • What damage it can cause

B. Protecting Technology on Earth

Solar storms can disrupt:

  • Banking systems
  • Internet backbone cables
  • Aviation communications
  • Power transformers

For example:
A strong storm can force airlines to avoid polar routes as radio signals get jammed.

C. Boosts Global Research Role of India

Aditya-L1 proves India is not just observing space but is leading discoveries in heliophysics (the study of the Sun).


6. How does Aditya-L1 work with other satellites?

India collaborated with six U.S. missions such as:

  • NASA’s Wind, ACE, THEMIS-C
  • NOAA’s DSCOVR
  • STEREO-A, MMS

Together, they form a global network watching the Sun from different positions—like CCTV cameras covering different angles.


7. Why is this a milestone for ISRO?

First time India helped explain a global solar phenomenon

The discovery shows the scientific maturity of India’s first solar mission.

Helps India protect its own satellites

India relies on satellites for:

  • Navigation (NAVIC)
  • Agriculture monitoring
  • Telecommunication
  • Disaster warning

Aditya-L1 helps India prepare for space-weather emergencies.


8. Summary of Key Takeaways

  • The 2024 solar storm was unusually strong because two CMEs collided and caused massive magnetic reconnection.
  • Aditya-L1 measured this and found the reconnection region to be 100 times Earth’s size.
  • The discovery improves global understanding of solar storms.
  • It highlights India’s growing scientific contribution to space-weather prediction.

UPSC PRELIMS QUESTION:

With reference to the objectives of Aditya–L1, consider the following statements:

1. To study the origin and acceleration of solar wind.

2. To understand the heating mechanism of the solar corona.

3. To observe solar flares and Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs).

4. To study space-weather impact on Earth's magnetosphere from low Earth orbit.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

A. 1, 2, and 3 only
B. 1 and 4 only
C. 2, 3, and 4 only
D. 1, 2, 3, and 4

Correct Answer: A

Explanation:

  • Statements 1, 2, 3 → Correct core objectives.
  • Statement 4 → Incorrect → Aditya-L1 is not in low Earth orbit; it is at Sun–Earth L1.


GS Paper II (Polity & Governance)

A. Structure, Organization & Functioning of the Judiciary

  • High Court & Supreme Court judges
  • Appointment, tenure, removal
  • Independence of judiciary

B. Separation of powers

  • Checks and balances between Parliament & Judiciary
  • Impeachment as a constitutional mechanism

C. Important Constitutional Articles

  • Article 217 → Removal of High Court Judges
  • Article 124(4) → Procedure of removal
  • Article 124(5) → Parliament’s power to regulate procedure

D. Judicial Accountability & Ethics

  • “Proved misbehaviour or incapacity”
  • Judicial impartiality
  • Public confidence in the judiciary

Prelims Syllabus

  • Indian Polity:
    • Articles of the Constitution
    • Removal of judges
    • Powers of Speaker/Chairman, role of President

INDIA bloc MPs seek to impeach Madras HC judge




I. Background of the Tamil Nadu Deepam Row

To understand the impeachment demand, we must first know the recent controversy involving the judge and the Karthigai Deepam festival in Tamil Nadu.


1. What is Karthigai Deepam? (Basic Context)

  • A major Tamil Hindu festival celebrated at the Arunchaleswarar Temple, Tiruvannamalai, and many other temples.
  • A sacred lamp (Mahadeepam) is traditionally lit on the temple gopuram or atop a hill.
  • Devotees see this as a spiritual and cultural ritual.

2. What was the recent dispute?

Location Controversy

There was a dispute about where exactly the Deepam flame should be lit — on the traditional temple location or on a place associated with another religious shrine.

Community & Secular Concerns

  • Some groups argued that lighting Deepam near a dargah (Sufi shrine) was against tradition.
  • Others argued it was a long-standing practice.
  • It became a religious and political issue involving cultural identity and communal sensitivities.

3. What did Justice G.R. Swaminathan do? Why did it become controversial?

Justice Swaminathan reportedly passed an order related to the lighting of the Karthigai Deepam near a specific location at Thirupparankundram (Madurai), where both a temple and a dargah exist.

Opposition parties accused him of:

  • Taking a position that allegedly favoured one religious community
  • Giving remarks that were seen as politically or ideologically influenced
  • Not maintaining religious neutrality, which is expected from the judiciary

Example (Simplified):

If a judge interprets religious custom disputes in a way that seems to support one group repeatedly, opposition parties may allege bias even if the judge followed legal reasoning.

This is why MPs linked the Deepam row to allegations of partiality and violation of secular principles.


II. Why MPs Are Seeking Impeachment

The INDIA bloc MPs submitted a letter accusing the judge of:

1. Undue Favouritism

  • Alleged favouring of a particular senior advocate (M. Sricharan Rangarajan).
  • Favouring lawyers from a specific community.

2. Deciding Cases Based on Political Ideology

They claim his judicial conduct reflected a political tilt, violating the expectation of neutrality and independence.

3. Violation of Constitutional Secularism

MPs argued that some of his decisions contradicted the secular character of the judiciary.

4. Loss of Public Confidence in Impartiality

For impeachment, the essential test is:
Has the judge’s behaviour undermined public trust?

Opposition MPs claim the Deepam-related order and other actions raise such concerns.


III. Constitutional Provisions for Impeachment of a High Court Judge

This is crucial for UPSC GS-II.


1. Relevant Articles of the Constitution

Article 217(1)(b)

Allows removal of a High Court judge in the same manner as a Supreme Court judge.

Article 124(4)

Defines the procedure for removal of judges of higher judiciary.

Article 124(5)

Allows Parliament to regulate the procedure through parliamentary law.

Thus, impeachment of a High Court judge uses the same “proved misbehaviour or incapacity” standard as Supreme Court judges.


2. Grounds for Removal

There are only two grounds, and they must be proved:

1. Proved misbehaviour

2. Proved incapacity

These are not defined in detail, but examples include:

  • Corruption
  • Abuse of judicial office
  • Partisan behaviour
  • Criminal conduct
  • Severe misconduct
  • Mental or physical inability to discharge duties

3. The Removal Procedure (Step-by-Step in Simple Words)

This is important and scoring for UPSC answers.


Step 1: Notice of Motion

A removal notice must be signed by:

  • 100 Lok Sabha MPs, or
  • 50 Rajya Sabha MPs

It is then submitted to the Speaker or Chairman.


Step 2: Admission of Motion

The Speaker/Chairman can:

  • Accept it
  • Reject it
  • Ask for preliminary advice

Step 3: Formation of a Judicial Inquiry Committee

If accepted, a three-member committee is set up:

1. A Supreme Court judge

2. A Chief Justice of a High Court

3. An eminent jurist

They examine evidence and charges.


Step 4: Committee Report

  • If charges not proved, process ends.
  • If charges proved, the motion moves to Parliament.

Step 5: Parliamentary Approval

Both Houses must pass the motion with:

  • Two-thirds majority of members present and voting, AND
  • Majority of total membership of each House

This is an extremely high bar (to protect judicial independence).


Step 6: President Orders Removal

If Parliament passes the motion, the President removes the judge.


4. Why Impeachment is Rare in India

Only one judge has ever been removed:

  • Justice Soumitra Sen (though he resigned before removal)

Many impeachment attempts fail because:

  • High burden of proof
  • Strict majorities required
  • Political alignment changes
  • Judicial independence concerns

UPSC PRELIMS QUESTION:

With reference to the removal of a High Court Judge in India, consider the following statements:

1. A High Court Judge can be removed only on the grounds of “proved misbehaviour or incapacity.”

2. The procedure for removal of a High Court Judge is the same as that of a Supreme Court Judge.

3. The removal motion must be passed separately by both Houses of Parliament by a special majority.

4. The Constitution explicitly defines what constitutes “misbehaviour” for removal purposes.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

A. 1 and 2 only
B. 1, 2, and 3 only
C. 1, 3, and 4 only
D. 1, 2, 3, and 4

Correct Answer: B

Explanation:

  • Statement 1: Correct → Grounds are “proved misbehaviour or incapacity.”
  • Statement 2: Correct → Article 217(1)(b) refers to Article 124(4) procedure.
  • Statement 3: Correct → Each House must pass the motion with a special majority.
  • Statement 4: Incorrect → “Misbehaviour” is not defined in the Constitution.

GS Paper II (International Relations)

  • India and its neighbourhood relations
    • India–Nepal strategic ties
    • Defence cooperation
    • Confidence-building measures
  • Regional cooperation & strategic partnerships
    • Strengthening military diplomacy
    • Border security and coordination

Prelims Syllabus

  • Current events of national & international importance
  • Defence exercises
  • India’s bilateral relations

SURYAKIRAN-XIX: India-Nepal Army exercise concludes in Uttarakhand





1. What is SURYAKIRAN-XIX?

SURYAKIRAN is a joint military exercise held every year between the Indian Army and the Nepal Army.
This year was the 19th edition (XIX = 19), and it took place in Pithoragarh, Uttarakhand.

The purpose is to train together, learn from each other, and strengthen military cooperation.


2. Who supervised the exercise?

The Directors-General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of both countries:

  • India: Lt. Gen. Manish Luthra
  • Nepal: Maj. Gen. Anup Jung Thapa

They observed the final training sessions and validated the outcomes of the exercise.


3. What was the main focus of the exercise?

A. Counter-terrorism operations

The soldiers practiced:

  • How to fight terrorists in forests, mountains, and built-up areas
  • Coordinated mission planning
  • Working together as mixed teams

B. Joint tactics and techniques

This means both armies shared:

  • Their battle strategies
  • Best training practices
  • Experience from real-world operations

C. Operations as per the UN Charter

The drills followed guidelines under Chapter VII, which deals with:

  • International peace
  • Collective security operations
  • Handling threats to peace

4. What new technologies were used?

The exercise showcased modern military technologies, including:

  • ISR tools
    (Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance systems)
  • Precision-targeting drones
    Used for spotting enemy positions and delivering accurate attacks.
  • Night/day weapon sights
    Helping soldiers operate at any time.
  • AI-enabled surveillance feeds
    Artificial Intelligence used to detect threats automatically.
  • Unmanned logistics vehicles
    Robot-like machines carrying supplies.
  • Secure communication systems
    Preventing enemy interception.

These tools help armies respond faster and more safely.


5. Why is this exercise important?

A. Builds Interoperability

Interoperability means both armies can work together smoothly in real operations.

B. Strengthens Friendship

India and Nepal share:

  • An open border
  • Historical cultural ties
  • Close military relations (Nepalese Gorkha regiments serve in Indian Army)

The exercise deepens this partnership.

C. Enhances Security in the Himalayas

This region has:

  • Difficult terrain
  • Cross-border threats
  • Natural disaster risks

Joint training improves cooperation for:

  • Counter-terrorism
  • Mountain operations
  • Disaster response

6. Symbolic Gesture: Tree of Friendship

At the end of the exercise, the DGMOs planted a Tree of Friendship, symbolising:

  • Long-term partnership
  • Trust
  • Peace and cooperation between the two nations

7. Final takeaway

SURYAKIRAN-XIX:

  • Improved military coordination
  • Introduced advanced technologies
  • Enhanced counter-terrorism capabilities
  • Strengthened India–Nepal defence relations
  • Reinforced commitment to peace and stability in the region

UPSC PRELIMS QUESTION:

SURYAKIRAN-XIX, recently in news, is a joint military exercise between:

A. India and Bhutan
B. India and Nepal
C. India and Sri Lanka
D. India and Bangladesh

Answer: B


2nd WHO Global Summit on Traditional Medicine


Syllabus: GS-II — Governance: Health policy and international cooperation.

Context

India has officially begun the countdown to host the 2nd WHO Global Summit on Traditional Medicine, signalling a major international push to mainstream traditional, complementary and integrative medicine within global health discussions.

Key points:

  • Dates & Venue: Summit to be held 17–19 December 2025 at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi.


  • Hosts: Co-hosted by WHO and the Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India.


  • Supporting body: Backed by the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre (GTMC), Jamnagar.


  • Theme:Restoring balance: The science and practice of health and well-being.


  • Evidence-based integration: Emphasis on research, clinical trials, regulatory frameworks and quality benchmarks for traditional therapies.


  • Global participation: Delegations from 100+ countries, including ministers, policymakers, scientists and indigenous practitioners.


  • Digital health & innovation: Showcases digital repositories, AI-driven pharmacopeias, and biodiversity mapping for medicinal plants.


  • Biodiversity & sustainability: Focus on sustainable sourcing of medicinal plants and conservation of traditional knowledge systems.


  • Policy harmonisation: Aim to draft a decade-long roadmap for safe, equitable integration of traditional medicine into national health systems.


  • Health systems impact: Seeks pathways to incorporate traditional medicine into primary healthcare and universal health coverage.


  • Strategic significance: Strengthens India’s soft power and deepens WHO–India collaboration via GTMC Jamnagar.


Source: PIB


Dumping

Syllabus: GS-III — Economy: International Trade, WTO rules, Anti-dumping measures.

Context

The U.S. is considering new tariffs on Indian rice after American farmers alleged that India is dumping subsidised rice in the U.S. market, causing domestic price suppression.

Key points

  • Meaning of Dumping: Selling goods in a foreign market below domestic price or below production cost to gain market share.


  • Nature: A form of international price discrimination where goods cannot move back to the high-price market due to trade barriers.


  • Criteria: Dumping proven when export price < domestic price, or when compared with third-country price or average production cost.


  • Impact on domestic industry: Leads to price undercutting, reduced market share, financial losses, and potential job cuts.


  • Consumer impact: Short-term cheap imports, but long-term weakening of domestic producers.


  • Market distortion: Occurs when subsidies artificially lower export prices, triggering trade disputes.


  • WTO stance: Dumping is not illegal, but action allowed only if:


    • Dumping is proved,


    • Domestic industry shows material injury,


    • Injury is directly linked to dumping.


  • Anti-dumping duties: Importing country may impose duties equal to dumping margin under the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement.


  • Other countermeasures:


    • Countervailing duties to offset subsidies,


    • Import quotas,


    • Price undertakings,


    • Support to domestic industry for competitiveness.


Source: Indian Express


Senna spectabilis

Syllabus: GS-III — Environment: Invasive species, biodiversity threats, ecosystem management.

Context

Tamil Nadu has launched one of India's largest invasive-species eradication missions to completely remove Senna spectabilis from all forest divisions by March 2026, due to its rapid spread and severe ecological impacts.

Key points

  • Species type: A fast-growing invasive tree of the Fabaceae family, originally planted as an ornamental/shade species.


  • Origin: Native to South & Central America; now aggressively spreading in Nilgiris, Mudumalai, Sathyamangalam, Anaikatty and other Western Ghats areas.


  • Habitat preference: Thrives in dry–moist deciduous forests, disturbed woodland, savannahs; adapts to poor soils and full sunlight.


  • Growth features: Reaches 7–18 m, forms dense canopies, produces abundant long seed pods enabling rapid spread.


  • IUCN status: Classified as Least Concern globally.


  • Ecological impact: Creates monocultures suppressing native vegetation and biodiversity.


  • Wildlife impact: Reduces fodder availability, affecting movement of elephants, deer and other herbivores.


  • Fire risk: Accumulated dry biomass increases forest fire vulnerability.


  • Forest regeneration: Slows down natural regeneration, threatening ecosystem resilience in the Western Ghats.


Source: New Indian Express


Saudi UNESCO Global Network of Learning Cities (GNLC)

Syllabus: GS-II — International Organisations; Global Education Initiatives.

Context

UNESCO has added Riyadh, AlUla, and Riyadh Al-Khabra to the Global Network of Learning Cities (GNLC) in its 2025 update, expanding Saudi Arabia’s presence in the global lifelong-learning network.

Key points

  • About GNLC: UNESCO-led network promoting lifelong learning through inclusive, accessible, and sustainable learning ecosystems.


  • Established: 2013; now includes 425 cities across 91 countries, supporting nearly 500 million people.


  • Linked to SDGs: Aligns with UNESCO’s Education 2030 agenda and SDG-4 (Quality Education).


  • Core criteria: Cities must ensure lifelong learning systems, digital & AI readiness, skill development, entrepreneurship platforms, and sustainability-linked learning.


  • Saudi Arabia’s addition: Riyadh, AlUla, and Riyadh Al-Khabra recognised for meeting global benchmarks in community-wide learning; Saudi now has 8 GNLC cities.


  • Alignment with national policy: Supports Saudi Vision 2030 and the Human Capability Development Program.


  • India in GNLC: India has three GNLC cities — Warangal, Thrissur, and Nilambur (2022) — acknowledged for community learning, literacy initiatives, and public-space learning models.


Source: Times of India